'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Monday, April 26, 2010

on certainty 434


434. Now does experience teach us that in such-and-such circumstance people know this and that? Certainly, experience shews us that normally after so-and–so many days a man can find his way about a house he has been living in. Or even: experience teaches us that after such-and such a period of training a man’s judgment is to be trusted. He must, experience tells us, have learnt for so long in order to be able to make a correct prediction. But     



experience without interpretation is empty

interpretation gives experience form and content

interpretation is uncertain –

experience is uncertain

what experience teaches us is uncertainty

any ‘knowledge’ we have –

is uncertain

you may interpret the data of experience in a certain way –

all to the good if it suits your purpose –

but there is no certainty here

does experience teach us trust?

experience teaches us the validity of different interpretations

a correct prediction – is what?

a projection based on accepted premises –

that delivers the goods –

or that is interpreted as doing so

yes we take action –

yes we make predictions –

but any action taken –

any prediction made –

presupposes –

uncertain premises


© greg t. charlton. 2010.