'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Monday, April 12, 2010

on certainty 406


406. What I am aiming at is also the difference between the casual observation “I know that that’s a…”, as it might be used in ordinary life, and the same utterance when a philosopher makes it.



both are claims to an authority

the only authority is authorship –

and it is unnecessary and irrelevant –

to assert that you are the author –

of your assertion

the real function of the claim to know –

is rhetorical –

that is to persuade

in so far as you don’t have the authority –

you are suggesting –

that is an authority beyond authorship

the claim to know –

is an exercise in deception –

whether you are a philosopher –

or not


© greg t. charlton. 2010.