'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Saturday, April 24, 2010

on certainty 429


23.3.51
429.  What reason have I, now, when I cannot see my toes, to assume that I have five toes on each foot?

Is it right to say that my reason is that previous experience has always taught me so? Am I more certain of previous experience than that I have ten toes?

That previous experience may very well be the cause of my present certitude; but is it its ground?



the assumption of five toes on each foot –

is like any assumption –

open to question –

open to doubt

what reason do I have for making the assumption?

who’s to say?

likely you find the assumption appropriate –

for a whole lot of reasons

if you think that previous experience has taught you so –

that may well be your ‘reason’

if you are certain about this assumption –

all that means is that you haven’t thought about it –

you are on this matter operating in ignorance

and if by ‘ground’ here  is meant certainty –

there is no ground


© greg t. charlton. 2010.