'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Sunday, April 18, 2010

on certainty 417


21.3
417. “I know that for the last month I have had a bath everyday.” What am I remembering? Each day and the bath each morning? No. I know that I bathed each day and I do not derive that from some other immediate datum. Similarly I say “I felt a pain in my arm” without this locality coming into my consciousness in any other way (such as by means of an image).



the assertion – ‘for the last month I have had a bath every day’ –

is just that – an assertion –

it is open to question – open to doubt –

open to revision

Wittgenstein prefaces this assertion with ‘I know’ –

in so doing he corrupts the assertion –

‘I know that for the last month I have gad a bath every day’

is the attempt to render the proposition –

beyond question – beyond doubt

what we have here –

is propositional vandalism

‘I felt a pain in my arm’

is an assertion – like any other assertion –

open to question – open to doubt –

open to revision


© greg t. charlton. 2010.