375.
Here one must realise that complete absence of doubt at some point, even
where we would say that legitimate doubt can exist, need not falsify a
language-game. For there is also something like another arithmetic.
I believe that this admission must underlie
any understanding of logic.
first up there is no ‘falsification’ of a
language-game –
the language game is – uncertain
if you say that there is certainty – where
doubt can exist –
then you are a fraud
and so this other ‘arithmetic’ is –
deception
and yes if you hold with certainty –
this deception will underlie your
‘understanding’ of logic –
and your logic will be –
worthless
© greg t. charlton. 2010.
