'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Sunday, March 14, 2010

on certainty 338



338. But imagine people who were never quite certain of these things, but said that they were very probably so, and that it did not pay to doubt them. Such a person, then, would say in my situation: “It is extremely unlikely that I have ever been on the moon”, etc., etc. How would the life of these people differ from ours? For there are people who say that it is merely extremely probable that water over a fire will boil and not freeze, and that therefore strictly speaking what we consider impossible is only improbable. What difference does this make in their lives? Isn’t it rather that they talk rather more about things than the rest of us?



those who recognize uncertainty –

the difference is not that they talk more –

it is that they understand more

and what difference does it make to their lives?

well who is to say?

my bet would be that they live without delusion –

and that they live without  prejudice –

and that they are open to the possibilities –

of this life


© greg t. charlton. 2010.