12.3.51
318.
‘The question doesn’t arise at all.’ Its answer would characterize a method. But there is no sharp boundary
between methodological propositions and propositions within a method.
the question arises – if the question is asked
–
and if its answer –
would characterize a method –
then presumably the question –
would be a question of method
and yes –
‘there is no sharp boundary between
methodological propositions and propositions within a method’
it’s all a question of context and use
every proposition characterizes a method –
a way of going about things
and any proposition can be a proposition within a method
within a propositional framework
if what you are doing involves a number of
propositions –
how you organize –
will determine which proposition – as it
were – leads –
or underpins –
and which propositions – follow –
or function as support
what is what here –
will be determined by the task at hand –
and might well be a fluid matter –
any working propositional organization
will be open to question –
open to doubt –
propositional conception and action –
gets its vitality –
from uncertainty
© greg t. charlton. 2010.
