'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Wednesday, March 24, 2010

on certainty 370


370. But more correctly: The fact that I use the word “hand” and all the other words in my sentence without a second thought, indeed that I should stand before the abyss if I wanted so much as to try doubting their meanings – shews that absence of doubt belongs to the language-game, that the question “How do I know…” drags out of the language game, or else does away with it.



so – ‘how do I know?’ – is not relevant –

this language-game – that Wittgenstein imagines –

is not one that exists in actuality –

yes – at times we use words – without a second thought –

but it doesn’t follow from this –

that their meaning is without question

and what is Wittgenstein to say of language users who question any claim to knowledge?

he can only say they are not playing his game –

but that’s ok –

for this game of his –

will not be anything anyone who actually uses language –

will recognize


© greg t. charlton. 2010.