'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Friday, March 26, 2010

on certainty 373


373. Why is it supposed to be possible to have grounds for believing something if it isn’t possible to be certain?



yes –

there are no grounds to knowledge or belief –

what we have is assertion

and the underwriting – of assertion

these underwritings –

or secondary propositions –

are nothing more than rhetorical devices or props –

the point of which is to pretend a security –

for the primary assertion

and on the basis of this pretence

to persuade of the significance –

or importance

of the primary assertion


© greg t. charlton. 2010.