'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Friday, November 28, 2014

Philosophical Grammar 57


57. Someone copies a figure on the scale of 1 to 10. Is the understanding of the general rule of such mapping contained in the process of copying?

 Or was the process merely in agreement with that rule, but also in agreement with other rules?



the copying could be performed without any knowledge of the general rule of mapping –

is the general rule of mapping contained in the process of copying?

it can be described that way

and it could well be described as being in agreement with other rules

what we have here is an action – an activity – described – and one that can be described in any number of ways

an action – without description – is unknown –

what an action ‘contains’ – how it is understood –

depends entirely on how it is described

if I perform the action – how do I understand it?

however I describe it

if you are observing the action – how do you understand it?

however you describe it –

yes – we have standard forms of description

however there is no rule as to how you describe –

no rule as to how you understand



© greg t. charlton. 2014.