'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Friday, November 14, 2014

Philosophical Grammar 38


38. Forgetting the meaning of a word. Different cases. The man feels, as he looks at blue objects, that the connection between the word “blue” and the colour has been broken off. We might restore the connection in various ways. The connection is not made by a single phenomenon, but can manifest itself in various processes. Do I mean then that there is no such thing as understanding but only manifestations of understanding? A senseless question.



it is not clear here whether the man in question can apply the word ‘blue’ at all –

in the example given – he doesn’t associate the word with the colour –

but does it have any significance for him?

his position is no different really to anyone learning the accepted use of the word ‘blue’ – for the first time

we are told accepted use by others – and we move on from there –

or we see how the word is used

use of any word – or any proposition – is open to question – open to doubt

even when we have as it were mastered accepted use – at every turn we face uncertainty

but here nothing is ‘broken off” – the traffic of language is uncertainty

logically speaking understanding is engagement with language

and any understanding is open to question – open to doubt – is uncertain



© greg t. charlton. 2014.