'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Friday, November 21, 2014

Philosophical Grammar 49


49.  A colour chart might be arranged differently or used differently, and yet the words mean the same colours as with us.

Can a green label be a sample of red?

Can it be said that when someone is painting a certain shade of green he is copying the red of a label?

A sample is not used like a name



a colour chart is not a language

it is a like representing a class of words (colour words) out of any linguistic contexts

it is like freezing the use of these words

it is a ruse to present language as definite –

when in fact actual language and use of language is propositional –

is uncertain

can a green label be a sample of red?

here is depends what you mean by sample –

if you mean – and it seems unlikely – that yes – green is a constituent of red –

then yes –

but in common parlance green is not red

can it be said that when someone is painting a certain shade of green he is copying the red of a label?

if you are talking about the process of painting – perhaps yes

what all this points to though –

is that language is always up for grabs –

any term used in any sentence is open to question –

open to discussion

and yes – understanding the context of language will assist in determining on-going usage

a sample is not used like a name?

a name defines – in the sense of a label – a label that has conventional meaning and use

a sample of a thing – is the thing in a modified form –

already named



© greg t. charlton. 2014.