'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Tuesday, November 04, 2014

Philosophical Grammar 24


24. Explanation can clear up misunderstandings. In that case understanding is a correlate of explanation. – Definitions.

It seems as if other grammatical rules for a word had to follow from its ostensive definition. But is this definition really unambiguous? One must really understand a great deal of a language in order to understand the definition.



explanations clear up misunderstandings?

what we are dealing with is uncertainty – not misunderstanding

‘misunderstanding’ – assumes before any propositional action – that there is a true or correct understanding

an ‘explanation’ – is an underwriting of a proposition – if you like an interpretation –

and an ‘explanation’ so called – as with any proposal – any proposition –

is open to question – open to doubt

so too with any proposal for understanding –

our understanding – is uncertain –

and therefore logically speaking the idea of a ‘misunderstanding’ – has no place

understanding as a correlate of explanation?

yes – in that any explanation – any understanding –

is open to question

an ostensive definition – has no special logical status –

as with any proposal – any proposition – it is open to question –

open to doubt –

uncertain



© greg t. charlton. 2014.