'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Wednesday, November 05, 2014

Philosophical Grammar 26


26. So how does it come about that on the strength of this definition we understand the word?

What’s the sign of someone’s understanding a game? Can’t he learn a game by simply watching it being played? Learning and speaking without explicit rules. We are always comparing language with a game according to rules.



definitions are directives for use –

understanding will come with use

how does it come about?

what it amounts – how it comes about –

is the occasion for more language use –

for proposals – propositions –

any proposal – any proposition –

will be a response to uncertainty –

it may be useful – it may not –

language goes on without definitiveness –

and any claim to definitiveness – to certainty –

is rhetoric – plain and simple –

logically speaking any proposal – is open to question –

open to doubt – uncertain

what’s the sign of someone’s understanding a game?

in any final sense – we don’t know –

we take what we are given –

and make a decision – one way or the other

the truth is we use language – without knowing

it is if you kike a logical structure –

we climb along

we operate in contests of use –

and make decisions –

these decisions can be explained in term of rules –

that is a common account –

an account that gives the appearance of foundation –

to language to knowledge –

some find this pretence –

comforting



 © greg t. charlton. 2014.