'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Tuesday, November 04, 2014

Philosophical Grammar 16


16. What does it mean to say that the “is” in “The rose is red” has a different meaning from the “is” in “twice two is four”? Here we have one word but as it were different meaning-bodies with a single end surface: different possibilities of constructing sentences. The comparison of the glass cubes. The rule for the arrangement of the red sides contains possibilities, i.e. the geometry of the cube. The cube can also serve as a notation for the rule if it belongs to a system of propositions.



one word with different-meaning bodies – different applications –

the  different applications emerge from practice –

we can try and explain such in terms of so called rules –

‘explanations’ of practice

rules that contain possibilities?

no explanation of practice is every complete

any ‘system of rules’ – is epistemologically unstable –

hence possibility

and the making of a rule or a rule for a rule –

is the result of what?

observation – experience – imagination – inspiration?

the logical point is that a rule underwrites practice –

basically it restates accepted practice

and the authority of a rule?

any so called ‘authority’ not logical –

it is rhetorical

logically speaking a rule is nothing more than a proposal

no different to any other proposition –

open to question – open doubt –

uncertain



© greg t. charlton. 2014.