'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Monday, August 30, 2010

on certainty 624


624. “Can you be mistaken about this colour’s being called ‘green’ in English?” My answer to this can only be “No”. If I were to say “Yes, for there is always the possibility of a delusion”, that would mean nothing at all.

For is that rider something unknown to the other? And how is it known to me?



yes – the colour may be called ‘green’ –

but this is just a fact of usage –

it is contingent –

it is uncertain

the point being that in different contexts –

e.g.. scientific and artistic –

different terms may well be used –

different usages may be invented

‘the possibility of a delusion’ –

when you get down to it –

is nothing more than –

the possibility of different usage

‘and is this rider unknown to the other?’

any competent user of language –

understands the uncertainty –

of language use

‘how is it known to me?’

how is uncertainty revealed?

uncertainty –

is the ground of propositional reality

language use reveals –

uncertainty


© greg t. charlton. 2010.