'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Monday, August 23, 2010

on certainty 603



603. I am taught that under such circumstances this happens. It has been discovered by making the experiment a few times. Not that that would prove anything to us, if it weren’t that this experience was surrounded by others which combine with it to form a system. Thus, people did not make experiments just about falling bodies but also about air resistance and all sorts of other things.

But in the end I rely on these experiences, or on the reports of them, I feel no scruples about ordering my own activities in accordance with them. – But hasn’t this trust also proved itself? So far as I can judge – yes.



a system of propositions – of proposals –

is no more certain – than a single proposition –

a single proposal

regarding a proposition as part of a system –

may give you a sense of security 

but in the end –

the system – is just packaging

the reality here is –

if you want to see where a proposition goes – what it offers –

you play along –

if playing this language-game suits your purpose –

you’ll continue to play it –

if it is the only option available to you –

you’ll make the best of it

‘so far as I can judge’ –

is a good way of putting it -

for it makes clear –

that any judgment you make –

will be incomplete –

will be uncertain


© greg t. charlton. 2010.