'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Saturday, January 17, 2015

Philosophical Grammar 127


127. Can I think away the impression of individual familiarity where it exists; and think it into a situation where it does not? The difficulty is not a psychological one. We have not determined what that is to mean.

Can I look at a printed English word and see it as if it I hadn’t learnt to read?

I can ascribe meaning to a meaningless shape.



yes if you question – what you have come to know – if you doubt it – you can see it in a new light

seeing in a new light – is not being familiar

familiarity is a matter of non-critical propositional use –

a new situation – can be so transformed

behaviour is either logical – or not –

that’s psychology

‘Can I look at a printed English word and see it as if it I hadn’t learnt to read?’

not if you have just read it

‘I can ascribe meaning to a meaningless shape’?

well a shape is a shape – so in that respect – it’s not meaningless –

so you don’t here begin with meaninglessness –

you begin with the description ‘shape’

as to how you further describe this shape –

well whatever you come up with – will be open to question – to doubt – will be uncertain

you will work with whatever proposal – whatever proposition or set of propositions –

suit your purpose



© greg t. charlton. 2015.