'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Thursday, January 01, 2015

Philosophical Grammar 111


111. It is the calculus of thought that connects with extra-mental reality. From expectation to fulfillment is a step in a calculation.



‘extra-mental reality’?

this is a proposal – a proposition – a description – of reality –

the underlying or assumed proposal describes reality in terms of mental and extra-mental –

and if you accept such a description – you think in terms of reality being some combination of radically different ontologies –

radically different descriptions

let’s take a step back here –

reality in the absence of any description is unknown –

we propose to make known –

and any description we operate with can be accounted for – ‘explained’ – in terms of complex propositional histories –

and philosophers have developed these propositional histories

these complex descriptions – like any proposal – are open to question – to doubt –
uncertain

nevertheless – for one reason or another a description such as ‘extra –mental reality’ has a currency – has use

‘a calculus of thought’ –

if you have reason to describe your propositions – or a set of your propositions with the description ‘calculus of thought – all to the good

as to connecting ‘the calculus of thought with extra-mental reality’ –

this a proposal – and how it is argued will determine it’s fate –

the logical reality is – the argument goes on

‘From expectation to fulfillment is a step in a calculation’?

‘a step in a calculation’?

that is one way of seeing it – of describing it – explaining it –

and in certain contexts – it may be quite useful –

however what we are trying to do here is to cover the unknown –

explain the relation between two events if you like – expectation and fulfillment –

two proposals – two descriptions –

in practice it becomes a question of context – what proposals are seen to work in what contexts –

that is the way of things –

however let’s not get ahead of ourselves – and take our proposals too seriously –

all we are dealing with is propositions – descriptions – open to question – to doubt – in the end uncertain –

you use what works for you – where it works for you –

and regardless of any propositional baggage you carry –

or might be expected to carry – and indeed to unpack –

there is always a question



© greg t. charlton. 2015.