'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Sunday, September 19, 2010

on certainty 667


667. Even if I came to country where they believed that people were taken to the moon in their dreams, I couldn’t say to them: “I have never been on the moon. – Of course I may be mistaken”. And to their question “Mayn’t you be mistaken?” I should have to answer: No.”



to ask ‘mayn’t you be mistaken?’ –

is to ask – are you certain?

if you answer – yes –

what is the point of saying –

‘I may be mistaken’?

to say this is really no more than to pretend –

that there is some doubt

if you are certain –

there is no doubt

but then it might be useful –

from a rhetorical point of view –

to pretend doubt

to give the impression –

of having an open mind

you can either be certain or uncertain here –

if you are certain – the mistake is a pretense –

a bogus concept – of use to the fraud

if you are uncertain –

it doesn’t come up at all


© greg t. charlton. 2010.