'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Sunday, September 05, 2010

on certainty 641


641. “He told me about it today – I can’t be making a mistake about that.” – But what if it does turn out to be wrong?! – Mustn’t one make a distinction between the ways in which something ‘turns out wrong’? – How can it be shewn that my statement was wrong? Here evidence is facing evidence, and it must be decided which is to give way.



‘I can be making a mistake about that’ –

is to say – I am certain about it –

any assertion – is open to question – open to doubt –

and is therefore – uncertain

‘But what if it does turn out to be wrong?’

there is no right or wrong –

what we deal with is uncertainty

a statement is used – or it is not

‘the ways in which something turns out wrong’ –

is really the ways in which our expectations can be disappointed –

and it’s not worth spending too much time thinking about that

‘how can it be shown that my statement was wrong?’ –

all that is possible here is argument

that is all showing amounts to

evidence facing evidence –

is argument facing argument

uncertainty facing uncertainty

‘and it must be decided which is to give way’ –

yes a decision will be made –

and any decision made –

will be open to question –

open to doubt


© greg t. charlton. 2010.