'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Wednesday, September 08, 2010

on certainty 649


649. (I once said to someone – in English – that the shape of a certain branch was typical of an elm, which my companion denied. Then we came past some ashes, and I said “There, you see, here are the branches I was speaking about”. To which he replied “But that’s an ash” – and I said “I always meant ash when I said elm”)



‘I always meant ash when I said elm’

here there is a claim of certainty –

despite the fact –

the apparent fact of – uncertainty

and what justifies this claim?

nothing at all in fact –

it is just self-serving rhetoric 


© greg t. charlton. 2010.