'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Friday, September 03, 2010

on certainty 633

633. “I can’t be making a mistake” – but what if I did make a mistake then, after all? For isn’t that possible? But does that make the expression “I can’t be etc.” nonsense? Or would it be better to say instead “I can hardly be mistaken”? No; for that means something else.



‘I can’t be making a mistake’ –

is to say ‘I am certain’ –

a proposition is a proposal –

open to question –

open to doubt –

uncertain

the claim of certainty –

undermines any proposition –

it is illogical

‘I can hardly be mistaken –

amounts to –

begrudgingly recognizing uncertainty

if you understand –

that any proposition –

any proposal

is uncertain –

it is unnecessary and redundant –

to state the fact


© greg t.charlton. 2010.