'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Thursday, September 09, 2010

on certainty 650


650. This surely means: the possibility of a mistake can be eliminated in certain (numerous) cases. – And one does eliminate mistakes in calculation in this way. For when a calculation has been checked over and over again one cannot say “Its rightness is still only very probable – for an error may always still have slipped in”. For suppose it did seem for once as if an error had been discovered – why shouldn’t we suspect an error here?



the mistake doesn’t exist –

what you deal with in any calculation – is uncertainty

when you check a calculation –

you are recognising uncertainty

the rightness of the calculation –

is an assumption

effectively a pragmatic assumption –

you assume the rightness –

to go forward –

this assumption – like any assumption –

is open to question –

open to doubt

this does not stop us operating –

uncertainty –

it is the ground of action

‘for an error may always have slipped in’ –

is only to say –

you can never be sure

you follow practises –

you make assessments –

you make decisions –

you go forward –

in uncertainty


© greg t. charlton. 2010.