'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Wednesday, September 01, 2010

on certainty 630


630. It is simply the normal case, to be incapable of a mistake about the designation of certain things in one’s mother tongue.



the designation of certain things in one’s mother tongue –

is not a certain matter at all –

any designation must be understood in context

no doubt there are common practises –

but a common practise is not a certainty

if circumstance change – practises change

if we operated in a certain world –

ridiculous as that sounds –

there would be no mistakes

and in this real world of uncertainty –

likewise – there are no mistakes –

for in an uncertain world –

a mistake cannot be established –

all usage – is uncertain –

so this notion of a mistake –

is the idea you have –

when you haven’t given the matter any thought –

the ‘mistake’ is a pre-philosophical notion –

if indeed you can call it a ‘notion’ at all –

and it has no place in philosophical logic

so really you can only conclude –

that with the ‘mistake’ –

Wittgenstein missed the boat –

either that –

or he thought –

he could put one over


© greg t. charlton. 2010.