'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Wednesday, June 23, 2010

on certainty 527

527. An Englishman who calls this colour “red” is not ‘sure it is called “red” in English’.

A child who mastered the use of the word is not ‘sure that in his language this colour is called…’. Nor can one say of him that when he is learning to speak he learns that the colour is called that in English; nor yet: he knows this when he has learnt the use of the word.



that he is not sure it is called ‘red’ in English –

is really just to say he is not sure what this colour is called – in his language –

which is to say he recognizes that what a colour is called is an uncertain matter –

it is a question of context and within that context a  question of usage –

and in most cases a question of what is customary

and of course there is no certainty to any of this

and yes – if a child has ‘mastered’ – a use of a word –

then that child recognizes the uncertainty of  its usage

‘English’ is a description of language use –

whether or not you are aware that your language is called ‘English’ –

is irrelevant to whether you can use it or not

‘knowing’ that your language is called ‘English’ –

is just about being able to use –

another uncertain description


© greg t. charlton. 2010.