'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Sunday, June 13, 2010

on certainty 510


510. If I say “Of course I know that that’s a towel” I am making an utterance. I have no thought of verification. For me it is an immediate utterance.

I don’t think of past or future. (And of course it is the same for Moore, too)

It is just like directly taking hold of something, as I take hold of my towel without having doubts.



if by ‘utterance’  Wittgenstein means – a use of language without any claim to knowledge –

then ‘Of course I know that that’s a towel’ – is not an utterance

either that or ‘Of course I know’ – the claim of knowledge – is irrelevant to the utterance

if your ‘utterance’ is made – without a claim to knowledge –

it is nevertheless open to question – open to doubt –

even if you’re not


© greg t. charlton. 2010.