'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Friday, June 18, 2010

on certainty 520



13.4.
520. Moore has every right to say he knows there’s a tree there in front of him. Naturally he may be wrong (For it is not the same as the utterance “I believe there is a tree there.”) But whether he is right or wrong in this case is of no philosophical importance. If Moore is attacking those who say that one cannot really know a thing, he can’t do it by assuring them that he knows this and that. For one need not believe him. If his opponents had asserted that one could not believe this and that, then he could have replied: “I believe it.”



even when you use rhetorical tricks –

like prefacing an assertion with ‘I know’ or ‘I believe’ –

the value of the assertion –

with or without this baggage –

is determined by assent or dissent 


© greg t. charlton. 2010.