'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Thursday, June 10, 2010

on certainty 504


504. Whether I know something depends on whether the evidence backs me up or contradicts me. For to say one knows one has a pain means nothing.



‘evidence’ is nothing in a claim to know –

unless the claim to know –

is presupposed –

in the claim to evidence –

and the claim to know –

as a claim to an authority –

beyond authorship –

has no logical value –

it’s only value is rhetorical –

the point of evidence –

is persuasion –

‘evidence’ –

is rhetoric


© greg t. charlton. 2010.