'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Thursday, June 03, 2010

on certainty 494


494. “I cannot doubt this proposition without giving up all judgment.”

But what sort of proposition is that? (It is reminiscent of what Frege said about the law of identity.) It is certainly no empirical proposition. It does not belong to psychology. It has rather the character of a rule.



if you understand that a proposition –

is a proposal

and that a proposal is open to question –

open to doubt –

‘this proposition’ –

is no proposition at all

‘this proposition’ –

is a fraud

it is a statement designed –

to subvert the proposition –

and to replace it with –

pretense and prejudice


© greg t. charlton. 2010.