'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Tuesday, June 22, 2010

on certainty 526


16.4
526. If someone were to look at an English pillar-box and say “I am sure that it’s red”, we should have to suppose that he was colour-blind, or believe he had no mastery of English and knew the correct name for the colour in some other language.

If neither was the case we should not quite understand him.



what this example shows is just how irrelevant and frankly ridiculous the claim of surety  – is

we do understand him – because our language and our way of life is saturated with this rhetoric –

we have to deal with this rubbish all the time –and often when it is not so obviously vacuous

and if we are dealing effectively with it – we simply cancel it out of our considerations –

and indeed try and get others to see what a waste of breath it is


greg t. charlton. 2010.