'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Wednesday, July 01, 2009

on certainty 48


48. However, out of a host of calculations certain ones might be designated as reliable once for all, others are not yet fixed. And now, is this a logical distinction?



the ground of a calculation –

is never certain

the concepts that underlie calculation –

are open to question – open to doubt –

subject to dispute

this uncertainty – does not stop use –

does not stop us proceeding – with what we have – to hand

however to designate any proposition as ‘reliable once for all’ –

is just false –

it reveals a complete lack of understanding of the nature of the proposition –

of propositional reality –

either that –

or someone is running a piece of rhetoric –

thinking it will impress – persuade – someone –

of something

where there are alternative propositions –

a choice will be made –

and made on the basis of –

utility


© greg t. charlton. 2009.