'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Friday, July 17, 2009

on certainty 71


71. If my friend were to imagine one day that he had been living for a long time in such and such a place, etc. etc., I should not call this a mistake, but rather a mental disturbance, perhaps a transient one.



who’s to know – what he had in mind –

when he said what he said?

who’s to know for sure?

the point is –

if you’re smart about it –

you go with what you think is the case –

but you keep an open mind

there is no question of his friend –

making a mistake –

or not making a mistake –

what he said is open to question –

is open to doubt –

is uncertain


NB


if you say –

someone is ‘mentally disturbed’ –

because they say something –

you don’t understand –

really all you are doing –

is labelling –

your own ignorance


© greg t. charlton. 2009.