'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Monday, July 06, 2009

on certainty 55


55. So is the hypothesis possible, that all things around us don’t exist? Would that not be like the hypothesis of our having miscalculated our calculations?



the hypothesis that all things around us don’t exist –

is possible

for one – Wittgenstein has advanced it here

what sense if any you make of it –

will depend on the context of its use

it obviously has a use for Wittgenstein –

in this context of propositional logic

and there will be other contexts – other uses –

for example in a poetic context –

it may well be regarded as significant

as to miscalculating our calculations –

you either calculate – or you don’t

if you don’t follow the ‘rules’ of calculation –

it is not that you miscalculate –

you don’t calculate – you just don’t do it –

you don’t play the game

the ‘rules’ of calculation –

are open to question – open to doubt –

and historically speaking –

are the outcome of question and doubt

however questioning the game –

is a different matter –

to playing it


© greg t. charlton. 2010.