'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Tuesday, July 28, 2009

on certainty 88


88. It may be for example that all enquiry on our part is set so as to exempt certain propositions from doubt, if they are ever formulated. They lie apart from the route travelled by the enquiry.



a proposition is a proposal –

it is by its nature open to question –

a proposition is that which can be doubted

any enquiry set to exclude propositions –

is not an enquiry into anything –

this whole business of ‘exempting’ propositions from doubt –

is no more than a smug and stupid attempt –

to avoid scrutiny

not worthy of anyone with a brain

‘if they are ever formulated’

well you can’t get anything more ridiculous than this –

the idea apparently is you exempt from doubt –

propositions that don’t exist –

‘they lie apart from the route travelled by the enquiry’

we’ve got an enquiry into nothing –

and lying along the road of this enquiry –

propositions – that don’t exist


© greg t. charlton. 2009.