'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Saturday, July 18, 2009

on certainty 74


74. Can we say: a mistake doesn’t only have a cause, it also has a ground? I.e. roughly: when someone makes a mistake, this can be fitted into what he knows aright.



if you are mistaken – 

the idea is you know it –

and know it for sure

otherwise –

what you are dealing with is –

an uncertainty –

not a mistake

as to what you know ‘aright’ –

all ‘knowledge’ –

is open to question –

open to doubt

if your ‘knowledge’ is genuine –

it is uncertain

the ‘mistake’ – doesn’t fit in –

it has no place –

in the epistemological context

it is a false concept

the point of it –

is to bolster –

the sham idea –

of certainty


© greg t. charlton. 2009.