'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Sunday, July 25, 2010

on certainty 564

564. A language-game: bringing building stones, reporting the number of available stones. The number is sometimes estimated, sometimes established by counting. Then the question arises “Do you believe there are as many stones as that?”, and the answer “I know there are – I’ve just counted them”. But here the “I know” could be dropped. If however, there are several ways of finding something out for sure, like counting, weighing, measuring the stack, then the statement “I know” can take the place of mentioning how I know.



whether it’s ‘I know’ – or how I know –

there will be no certainty –

there will be no ‘finding something out for sure’ –

any assertion we make – in any circumstance –

is open to question – open to doubt –

is uncertain

what we use – what we operate with is –

uncertain propositions –

pretending ‘knowledge’ – as in certainty –

doesn’t change this fact –

all it does is load up the proposition –

with unnecessary and irrelevant baggage

and if the issue of ‘knowledge’ becomes the focus –

the actual proposition will be swamped –

in rhetorical rubbish –

and as result –

sabotaged


© greg t. charlton. 2010.