'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Sunday, July 18, 2010

on certainty 555

19.4
555. We can know that water boils when it is put over a fire. How do we know? Experience has taught us. I say “I know that I had breakfast this morning”; experience hasn’t taught me that. One also says “I know that he is in pain”. The language-game is different every time, we are sure every time, and people will agree with us that we are in a position to know every time. And that is why the propositions of physics are found in text-books for everyone.

If someone says he knows something, it must be something that, by general consent, he is in a position to know.



‘water boils when it is put over fire’

‘I had breakfast this morning’

‘he is in pain’

straight out assertions

prefacing these assertions with ‘I know’ –

does what?

burdens them with an irrelevance –

turns what are simple elegant statements –

into problematics

the claim of knowledge is a claim of authority –

the only authority you have is your authorship –

and if that is the case – no need to assert it –

and that is all ‘I know’ as a claim to authority – amounts to-

an assertion of authorship –

if your idea is that you have some other authority for your assertion –

you are engaging in pretence and deception

forget the rhetoric –

and simply make your assertions –

say what you have to say – clearly and simply –

without any rhetorical baggage

you assertions will have their day –

in the marketplace of assent and dissent –

claiming to know –

in the end – will have no effect –

one way or the other –

people will either agree or disagree –

most likely you will have a better run –

if you avoid pomposity and pretence

the logical reality is –

that any proposition you put forward –

is open to question –

open to doubt –

is uncertain

when Wittgenstein says ‘we are sure every time’

he shows himself to be either a con artist –

or a fool

the reason that the propositions of physics are found in texts books –

is not because they are certain –

but rather because the text book is a convenient  media –

for introducing students to physics –

and that means to uncertainty

if you are waiting for general consent –

for your knowledge – or your position to know –

you may as well through the towel in –

and just accept that your ‘knowledge’ – is uncertain

and without any authority –

but the fact of your assertion


© greg t. charlton. 2010.