'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Wednesday, July 14, 2010

on certainty 554

554. In its language-game it is not presumptuous. There it has no higher position than, simply the human language game. For there it has its restricted application.

But as soon as I say this sentence outside its context, it appears in a false light. For then it is as if I wanted to insist that there are things that I know.  God himself can’t say anything to me about them.



it’s language-game is presumption

it’s context is rhetoric –

in or out of a rhetorical context –

it is false

the point of rhetoric –

is deception


© greg t.charlton. 2010.