'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Tuesday, July 06, 2010

on certainty 544

544. Of course I may truthfully say “I know what this colour is called in English”, at the same time as I point (for example) to the colour of fresh blood. But - - -



what you can say is –

‘this colour is called  … in English’

and doing so –

is just an exercise in uncertainty –

for whatever you might say here –

is open to question –

open to doubt

pointing to the colour of fresh blood –

tells no one – anything –

effectively all that does is identify –

what is not said –

which is to say –

what is not known

as to the claim to knowledge –

any such claim is an assertion of an authority

the only actual authority –

is authorship –

and it is unnecessary and irrelevant –

to assert that that you assert

beyond authorship –

any claim to authority –

is false


© greg t. charlton. 2010.