'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Sunday, June 28, 2009

on certainty 43


43. What sort of proposition is this: “We cannot have miscalculated in 12 x 12 = 144”? It must surely be a proposition of logic.

–But now, is it not the same, or doesn’t it come to the same, as the statement 12 x 12 = 144’



the claim – ‘we cannot have miscalculated in …’

is a rhetorical claim –

as is the follow up statement here –

‘it must surely be a proposition of logic’

12 x 12 = 144 –

is a game proposition –

if you follow the instruction that is 12 x 12 = 144 –

you play the game –

the game of sign substitution –

and presumably you do so –

because you have a use for it

and if you actually play the game –

you play it as it as directed –

you play – without question

the concepts behind the proposition –

behind the game –

have  been developed –

in a context of argument and dispute

the ground of any mathematical proposition –

is uncertainty


© greg t. charlton. 2009.