'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Friday, June 12, 2009

on certainty 26

26. But can it be seen from a rule what circumstances logically exclude a mistake in the employment of rules of calculation?

What use is a rule here? Mightn’t we (in turn) go wrong in applying it?



a rule will not determine circumstance –

any so called ‘rule’ is a product of circumstance –

and like circumstance – uncertain

a mistake in the employment of the rules of calculation?

there are no mistakes – in an uncertain reality

any action we take  – is open to question –

open to doubt 


© greg t. charlton. 2009.