'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Monday, December 15, 2014

Philosophical Grammar 86


86. If you see the expression of an expectation you see what is being expected.

It looks as if the ultimate thing sought by an order had to remain unexpressed. – As if the sign was trying to communicate with us.

A sign does its job only in a grammatical system.



‘If you see the expression of an expectation you see what is being expected’?

if you see an expression – you may interpret it as the expression of an expectation

the expression itself – without any interpretation – is an unknown

now if you see the expression as an expression of an expectation – then what is being expected is like the expression itself – to be interpreted

we make quick assessments always – but any assessment – is open to question – open to doubt –  is uncertain

‘It looks as if the ultimate thing sought by an order had to remain unexpressed. – As if the sign was trying to communicate with us’?

there is no ‘ultimate thing’ –

an ‘order’ – like any other proposal – is open to question – open to doubt – uncertain

we interpret the sign – we don’t ‘communicate’ with it

‘A sign does its job only in a grammatical system’?           

a sign is interpreted –

it is likely that at least initially a sign will be interpreted within a  grammatical system or framework –

however a sign may well be given a new interpretation – outside of any grammatical system – or any framework –

there is no necessity as to how a sign is interpreted



© greg t. charlton. 2014.