'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Wednesday, May 12, 2010

on certainty 455


29.3
455. Every language game is based on words ‘and objects’ being recognized again. We learn with the same inexorability that this is a chair as that 2 x 2 = 4.



 recognition is an exercise in uncertainty –

in any act of recognition –

you are faced with question of how to describe –

you may have a description that you think will be useful –

but there is no certainty there –

always you have to decide – which description – if any –

of any number of possible descriptions –

best fits the circumstances – will be most useful –

and in a final sense – you  don’t know with any certainty –

what will and will not work –

but you take a stab – you proceed –

in uncertainty

‘this is a chair’ – is one possible description of a sate of affairs –

a state of affairs that without description – is unknown

if it’s a useful description –

it is likely that you will consider using it again

2 x 2 = 4 – is a language game of substitution –

and if you learn how to play the game –

you can play it any number of times –

what we are talking about here is repetition

not inexorability


© greg t. charlton. 2010.