'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Wednesday, May 12, 2010

on certainty 454

454. There are cases where doubt is unreasonable, but others where it seems logically impossible. And it seems to be no clear boundary between them.



Wittgenstein doesn’t say what these cases are –

and the reason is of course –

that if he did give examples –

they would be subject  to question –

to doubt

and his carefully worded charade –

would just collapse


© greg t. charlton. 2010.