'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Friday, May 07, 2010

on certainty 448


448. I want to say: If one doesn’t marvel at the fact that the propositions of arithmetic (e.g. the multiplication tables) are ‘absolutely certain’, then why should one be astonished that the proposition “This is my hand” is so equally?



whether someone is astonished or not –

has nothing to do with the issue of the logical status of propositions –

so Wittgenstein’s statement here –

is really just an example of his rhetoric –

his attempt to con you into adopting his view on certainty –

pretty poor effort really

any proposition – arithmetical or empirical –

is open to question –

open to doubt –

is uncertain

with arithmetical propositions –

what you have is instruction –

instruction for a game of sign substitution

if you play the game –

you play it without question –

however you can play the game –

and at the same time understand –

that every term and every concept –

involved in the game –

is uncertain


© greg t. charlton. 2010