'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Wednesday, January 20, 2010

on certainty 243


243. One says “I know” when one is ready to give compelling grounds. “I know” relates to a possibility of demonstrating the truth. Whether someone knows something can come to light, assuming that he is convinced of it

But if what he believes is of such a kind that the grounds that he can give are no surer than his assertion, then he cannot say that he knows what he believes.



look –

‘compelling grounds’ is whatever one thinks will be persuasive

so what we are talking about here is rhetoric

and being ‘convinced of it’ –

is just about ‘talking yourself into it’ –

persuading yourself –

or at least giving the impression –

that you are persuaded

saying you believe

is to pretend an authority for your statement –

and that supposed ‘authority’ – is your belief –

it’s not as strong as the pretence of knowledge –

but like ‘I know’ – ‘I believe’ –

is a rhetorical devise

here is how it is if you drop the rhetorical baggage –

you say what you have to say –

others will agree with you –

or they won’t

your statement will be acted on –

or it won’t –

it’ll be useful –

or not


© greg t. charlton. 2010.