'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Sunday, November 22, 2009

on certainty 167


167. It is clear that our empirical propositions do not all have the same status, since one can lay down such a proposition and turn it from an empirical proposition into a norm of description.

Think of chemical investigations. Lavoisier makes experiments with substances in his laboratory and now he concludes that this and that takes place when there is burning. He does not say that it might happen otherwise another time. He has got hold of a definite world- picture – not of course one that he invented: he learnt it as a child.  I would say world-picture and not hypothesis, because it is the matter-of-course foundation for his research and as such also goes unmentioned.



yes – Lavoisier operated with norms – assumptions –

propositions – the truth of which – he assumed – for the purposes of his work –

Wittgenstein says he didn’t invent his world-picture – but learnt it as a child –

if so what he learnt was how to operate with propositions –

the ground of which is unknown


© greg t. charlton. 2009.