'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Wednesday, February 10, 2010

on certainty 282


282.  I cannot say that I have good grounds for the opinion that cats do not grow in trees or that I had a father and a mother.

If someone has doubts about it – how is that supposed to have come about? By his never, from the beginning, having believed that he had parents? But then, is that conceivable, unless he has been taught it?



Wittgenstein admits that he has no good grounds for the opinion that he had a father and a mother –

so why does he believe it?

because he was taught it

and he is likely to continue to believe it –

until doubts are raised

the same would be true if had been taught that he didn’t have parents –

and everyone he came in contact with agreed with this –

and he would continue to believe it –

until doubts were raised –

either by himself or others

so it is really just a question of what is put to you –

and whether it is challenged


© greg t. charlton. 2010.