'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Monday, September 15, 2008

Rorty's solidarity or objectivity IV

there are rationalities (plural)

when I come to participate in a social practise – an activity with others – I will in short accept the rules and norms of that practise

for the duration of that practise the norms of that practise are my rationality

in different places and different times we operate with different rationalities

this multiplicity of rationalities points to the fact that there is no single universal account of rationality

which is to say there is no one theory of how to proceed

so yes there are cultural rationalities – agreed social practises and all they entail

it is not they are incommensurable with other rationalities

it is rather that there is no question of commensurability

different rationalities underlie different practises

the common ground of all practises is the unknown

the common ground of all rationalities is the unknown

the Tasmanian aborigines and the British colonist had trouble communicating – this is true

what they were facing in each other’s eyes was the unknown

and the question in any such situation is confrontation or embrace

confrontation is based on fear of the unknown

embrace is based on the recognition that the unknown is what underlies all difference – that it is the common ground – and therefore that from which one can move forward with another towards a new understanding



© greg. t. charlton. 2008.